Facebook, a major US IT, which was a hot topic around the world after announcing the company name change to "META" last week, abolished the "face recognition" function in SNS "Facebook", and over 1 billion face data.Was revealed to delete.
[Video] Discussion of facial authentication technology is discussed with EXIT
Until now, Facebook provides services that automatically recognize and identify the face of the person in photos and videos.This could know that other users were in the post.However, Meta explains that "all new technologies have both profits and concerns. We want to find an appropriate balance."
Kenji Tsukakoshi, a part -time lecturer at Gakushu University and Takushoku University, specializes in information sociology, said, "Recent Facebook has a bad reputation for recent Facebook, including a former employee accusing in September.I think that it is about trying to keep the technology with problems once in the concept of saying that it is a major company to keep a little distance from these technologies, and META is also appearing.I think you should think you're riding there. "
Ao -chan, the leader of the gal unit "BLACK DIAMOND", said, "In my case, I was often tagged with photos that were not shown in the relationship with makeup, and I thought it was not very accurate.The face authentication of the smartphone is useless (laughs), and I think that it is still suspicious as a technology. Fingerprint is better. "
In addition, Aimi Shibata, a free announcer, said, "In the past, there was a debate that installing security cameras itself would be a surveillance society, but now it is natural to set up. Who is the evolution of technology.I couldn't stop it, and it seems difficult to stop the surveillance socialization. I wonder if I will get used to a society that is recognized. "
Mr. Tsukagoshi said, "As many people are trying, such as whether you can break through with disguise, the level of fingerprint authentication is higher than face authentication at this stage. In fact, in the United States, innocent people have been misunderstood and arrested.The incident has also happened, and Mr. Shibata's point is a very important issue. A long time ago, it was common sense in the public that "I don't want to have a surveillance camera." But now at university.When I ask a student, many people say, "If you have a surveillance camera, there is no strange guy, but rather free."
A while ago, an app that processed a face called "SNOW" was popular, but it was also developed as entertainment based on face -aware technology.In that sense, it can be regarded as a facial recognition technology has a great benefit for us.On the other hand, by linking to other data, it will be possible to do various things. "
In fact, it was criticized that he was trying to detect the source of the JR East system using a surveillance camera with a facial recognition function.However, EXIT's Kaneka Daiki, "Do you have such a consciousness of being" seen ". If you're doing anything wrong, I don't think it's tracked.""Sometimes a security camera is" not yet "in a train where crime is likely to occur," he said.
Former Department of Bureau Usamiya said, "The face data itself is not valuable, but it is a matter of how to use it by combining other data, and it will be used to investigate terrorism and obstacles.It would be good, but if only the data is piled up without specifying the purpose, the effect of leakage will be large.I thought it would be nice to lose the list of attribute data such as names and addresses to be diverted or to be abused. "
Mr. Tsukagoshi said, "A few years ago, a car was turned over in Halloween in Shibuya, but at that time it was said that it would be searching for the culprit using a surveillance camera video. In that sense, in that sense.There is no doubt that it will lead to a crime deterrence. "I'm not doing bad things, and it should be that much."
However, let's attach it to the train, next time, let's put it in the house for the safety of my body. The society where the surveillance camera has been expanded is that all the machines have been managed by machines.I think that it is a society of "what is a human being" drawn by a science fiction work, as to whether it can not be done or what a human is to act freely.
There are concerns that face recognition technology will lead to discrimination.For example, in the report issued during the Obama administration era in the United States, the engineer who made the system had a prejudice before noticing that there were many white men, and a minority and discriminatory was completed.It was pointed out.According to human rights organizations, the data analysis of blacks and women was less compared to the data of white men, so it was said that there were many more misunderstandings.
Regarding Facebook, if you have 30 "likes" "data, you will know that you do not necessarily want to tell others, such as the person's sexual orientation, which is convenient for many, so.It means that there is a possibility that it will be disadvantageous for those who do not. In the case of EU, which is strict in handling personal information, it has a very harsh attitude about data, including faces, but Japan is still a bit vague.There is a place. That is where we need to think carefully. "(From "Abema Prime")
ひろゆき氏「FF14の後追いっすよね」 で見る便利になるならOK? 郵便局の顧客データ、事業外の利用はどこまで認めるべき? で見るドローンによる荷物の配送はココまで来ている…! 直面する課題は法制度とバッテリーコストか で見る